http://cdent.disqus.com/enWed, 17 Jun 2009 03:50:34 -0000http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/124826535#comment-11035449<p>This is cool. I have a couple of reactions, neither of which are meant to suggest better ways of doing things, rather point out alternatives that I've seen used:</p><p>1) serializer vs. mounting URL paths to template content</p><p>For the ILGA project, which has been my primary use of TiddlyWeb, we have used a lot of templating to render tiddler content as HTML pages. To do this, we have added URL paths such as '/article' or '/index.html' that trigger the templating process. There is more about our experiences here: <a href="http://jaybyjayfresh.com/2009/06/13/using-tiddlyweb-as-a-content-management-system-for-ilga-org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jaybyjayfresh.com/2009/06/13/using-tiddlyweb-as-a-content-management-system-for-ilga-org/">http://jaybyjayfresh.com/2009/06/13/using-tiddlyweb-as-a-content-management-system-for-ilga-org/</a></p><p>2) serializer vs. static plugin to get js/css files</p><p>In an embryonic project called "WikiCSS" (the only thing I have written about this is here: <a href="http://jnthnlstr.tiddlyspot.com/#WikiCSS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jnthnlstr.tiddlyspot.com/#WikiCSS">http://jnthnlstr.tiddlyspot.com/#WikiCSS</a>), I wanted to allow tiddlers to be retrieved and interpreted as .css files. To do this, I was hoping to write a Serializer to do the job; in fact, I think this did happen but I can't find it now.</p><p>J.</p>jayfreshWed, 17 Jun 2009 03:50:34 -0000http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/124826535#comment-11030652<p>Beautiful. I had begun to suspect that tiddlyweb was awesome. This clearly shows that it is. Well done!</p>Simon BairdTue, 16 Jun 2009 23:09:02 -0000