<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Peer Pressure - Latest Comments in Info Condom</title><link>http://cdent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cdent.disqus.com/info_condom/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:08:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Info Condom</title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/157958226#comment-14438585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm strange too...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, to what extent would the user even have to be aware of the underlying architecture?&lt;br&gt;Even if the respective user IDs didn't share a common domain, the aggregation would bring it all into the same context.&lt;br&gt;This seems to work well with e-mail, instant messaging etc. Many people I know are only familiar with the application providing the interface to the respective service (e.g. Thunderbird or Pidgin). Asking for user details often results in blank stares.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FND</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>